Family Portrait Settings and More - SnapChick Q&A

Family Portrait Settings and More – SnapChick Q&A



I’m answering viewer questions, like what settings to use for family portraits, the type of music I listen to while working, and the best lenses!
Subscribe to my channel!
Follow me on Facebook!
Follow me on Instagram!
See more at
More Q&A videos!

Hi! I’m SnapChick. My channel is about photography as an art form and as a lifestyle, with a healthy dose of technology thrown in! I post new videos every week so subscribe here on YouTube, follow me on Facebook, Twitter and Google+, and join in on the conversation!

Comments

10 responses to “Family Portrait Settings and More – SnapChick Q&A”

  1. Julita Zebrowski Avatar
    Julita Zebrowski

    Have you tried your 17-55mm on an FX camera? Did you like it at all if so?

  2. Farrokh Mabhouti Avatar
    Farrokh Mabhouti

    Hi there,
    I just would like to let you know that your personality as appears, the way you talk, your taste of even wall colour, your appearance ,…is very much admirable. My brain hardly can concentrate to speech but I can listen to you for all 9.48 minutes without loosing interest of the topic. I wish you all the world's success.

  3. Michael Nguyen Avatar
    Michael Nguyen

    60FPS for the win.

  4. Chrismzeller Avatar
    Chrismzeller

    If Dawan is looking for a macro lens that is great for portraits I would suggest the  105mm AFS G VR over the 105mm D. You already have a 50mm so the 60mm macro would not be much different for portraits and for real macro you need to get some subject distance that the 105mm allows. I have owned both the D and G version of the 105 and while the D lens is great for macro, the VR (G) version is better for natural light portraits where you may want more DOF and therefore a longer shutter speed. For pure macro, either work well.  The VR doesn't work for macro subjects as well as it does for far away subjects, and the AFS isn't much use since at true macro you will be manually focusing (by rocking back and forth) anyway. But the VR version is just as sharp and more versatile for other types of shooting than the D.

  5. saul gonzalez Avatar
    saul gonzalez

    i own the 105mm 2.8d and its pretty good i have use the 105mm 2.8g and the only difference in that the g is little faster and not as noisy as the d version but is sharppp and almost no distortion

  6. Eric Rossi Avatar
    Eric Rossi

    #60 fps lol Thanks for the insight as always. Cheers to 100k in 2016! Interesting you say to focus in front of a group photo though. Now in a stack of two, I agree, but for a stack of three, wouldn't you want to focus toward the middle to begin to get the even focal plane? Or would you just say that's to taste of the tog?

    Macro lens of choice is a new favorite and pickup, the Nikon 105mm with VR.

  7. Davy Mike Avatar
    Davy Mike

    I'm very happy that I've found this channel because I've found in general men are either gear heads or get lost in technical details without showing any creativity whereas a lot of female photographers I know are some of the most creative photographers out there! Great channel! And I really love how clean your decor in this video looks. A lot of content creators on YouTube have way too cluttered environments. Also kudos for not screaming at us like some do 🙂

  8. GeeZee Avatar
    GeeZee

    Do you a have a pricing video for entry level photographers

  9. StreetRiver Avatar
    StreetRiver

    Everytime 3. party lenses are mentioned, you point out less build quality than the native brands. This is tiresome as especially Tamron has heightened their game with fx. the 24-70 VC, 70-200 VC and the 15-30 VC. These are optically and in build quality equal or better than the Nikon versions imo. The 15-30 and the 70-200 I have personally together with the Nikon 24-70. Excellent combos for my D4. 🙂

  10. Mikhail Campbell Avatar
    Mikhail Campbell

    EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM